agustus essays

agustus essays Augustuss approach to change was effective in many ways that differenced from Julies Creasers. He was the general who dominated the strongest army that ruled the state. Augustus saw how diverse to the Roman polity civil war was. He understood that control of the legions by the civil government was necessary for the establishment of peace and order throughout the Roman Empire. He wanted to make some gradual change to make sure it wouldnt rise again. Augustus used a good approach when he chose to change the length of military service. The Roman legion became a specialized, long service force with an espirit decorp that earlier legions did not have. An officer witch Augustus personally appointed commanded to each legion, and the legionnaires pledged their allegiance to Augustus leader. Furthermore, Augustus recruited soldiers from the Roman provinces. Augustus reformed the provincial administrative system by creating a large civil service whose members came from a group of capable administrators that he had picked himself. Augustus had these new governors hold long terms of office in order to have sufficient long-term reforms. In order to hold back corruption, Augustus saw that the governors were paid fairly for their work. Their big financial problems problem facing Augustus was how to raise money for military wages and pensions. This financial problem was solved when he obtained Egypt as his personal possession. All the wealth of Egypt went directly to the imperial treasury. Therefore, Augustus directly controlled the imperial treasury. There was reliability on Augustus that funds would be paid. He also created new taxes to boost the government's income: a sales tax, and inheritances tax and slaves tax. Therefore, Augustus gradual change placed a big importance on the traditional religion of Rome. He believed that prosperity and peace in the state relied on ...

Wife of Martin Guerre. essays

Wife of Martin Guerre. essays An eleven year olds destiny had already been adhered to. Bertrande de Rols had been married at this tender age in 1539. She was married in Artigues, a small isolated French town where the crags and the valleys of the Pyrenees were the cause of their prosperity and pride. Martin Guerre was the other half of the married couple, three years her senior, yet both were no older than babies themselves. Despite the fact that the young Bertrande had been married, she still resided in her own home. It was not until three years after she was married when tragedy struck. Bertrandes mother had died and she was sent to live the Guerre residence. Bertrande saw his features, exaggerated in the flare of the torch. . . and the realisation that henceforth her life lay beneath his jurisdiction came suddenly and overwhelmingly to the little girl. Already, Bertrandes life had been outlined, under the power of her father-in-law. Sympathy is effortlessly felt for the trapped naive girl, whose own personal identity will never be explored. Bertrande had nothing to live for except to be mistress of the farm. Without argument, she willingly takes on this position as she is aware of where she stands. Disregarding the fact that on the first night of married life, Bertrande endures, from her husband, a cuff upon her ears, a scratch on her face and a tug of her hair, Bertrande and Martin do eventually unite. Very well. Kneel. Monsieur Guerre struck the jaw of his child, Martin. Martin had not asked his father to participate in a bear hunt, and was welcomed back this way. It was not just, whispered Bertrande to Martin, proving that she possessed the ability to side with her husband, who was mischievous towards his authoritarian. Martin, you are brave, and it was with those words that Martin had fallen asleep, with his arm resting upon her shoulder. Here our fondn...

Family Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words - 6

Family Law - Essay Example However, still the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 remains a key legal rule for resolving the disputes developed when having to divide the property on marital breakdown.2 The validity of MCA 1973 could be doubted. Reference should be made to the fact that in 1996, through the introduction of the Family Law Act, the Family Law in Britain was reformed. As a result, the pre-existed legal rules had been absorbed by the above Act in terms that any other similar law would not have power. However, it seems that in practice the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 is still valid. This fact is highlighted in the study of Burton (2003) who notes that ‘for the time being the existing law, now largely contained in the MCA 1973, continuous in force’.3 Moreover, Lord Chancellor noted that the Family Law Act of 1996 is not appropriately customized to current social and judicial needs and for this reason the MCA 1973 should continue in force.4 Regarding specifically the section 25 of the MCA 1973, it should be noted that the above section actually sets the criteria used by the Court for the division of assets in the context of relationship breakdown. The above section is of high importance mentioning indicative the facts on which the Court should be based when having to rule in relevant cases. In accordance with the section 25 of MCA 1973, the decision of the Court in regard to the division of assets in the relationship breakdown can be based on one of the following acts: a) the financial and the physical status of each party/ spouse, b) the role that each spouse had in the accumulation of wealth and c) the age of each spouse. In fact, the age of each spouse indicates his potential to allocate the funds and the means for his/ her survival. It should be mentioned that the criteria set in section 25 of MCA 1973 regarding the division of assets among the